Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | jondwillis's commentslogin

Does it matter? Let them cook and get burned if they want to.

Works until it has access to write to external systems and your agent is slopping up Linear or GitHub without you knowing, identified as you.

Sure; I mean this is what I _would like_; I’m not saying this would work 100% of the time.

Feels like bitter lesson fodder to special case things like this

Why hinge it on COVID?

The reality is that the LLM overlord stays accessible most of the time. Works until it doesn’t is kinda adaptivity’s motto.

So the real test is waiting until the LLMs are inaccessible and then seeing what happens. Empirical testing!

Well there’s potential counter suit or court order to pay legal fees of the other party that might affect the profitability. I am not a lawyer


ask chaptgpt about space telescopes


There are no space-based radio telescopes.

(Well, none pointing at stars at least. There are some spy sats pointed down.)


could you imagine something as big as Arecibo was or FAST is floating in space? That'd be impressive. Would a constellation set up more like VLA be possible? Keep increasing the size of it with Starlink like launches??


There's a proposal for a large constellation of small, cheap-to-build radio sats. Heard about it on a Fraser Cain podcast. They plan to send them to one of the Lagrange points and spread them out in x KM cube pattern. They also want some of the sats to do some RF processing on-site, and beam just the "results" back.


These aren't telescopes, but it is quite similar to what you're describing otherwise:

https://research.google/blog/exploring-a-space-based-scalabl...


What's the point? The frequencies being listened to on these radio telescopes aren't affected by the atmosphere. Arecibo in space doesn't get you anything that Arecibo on the ground didn't (except hurricane resistance, I guess).

One exception is the far side of the moon to get away from radio noise. But other than that, there's no reason to put a radio telescope in space.


I'm a fan of ground based radio astronomy, however:

> there's no reason to put a radio telescope in space

sadly isn't as true as it once was ..

* https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/full_html/2024/09/aa51856-...

Once that constellation is fully expanded as intended, the planned chinese constellation joins it, and other nations (India?, the EU?) pile on, things will get even noisier.

The dark side of the moon offers hope, but it's still a lot of addiional awkwardness and expense that could be avoided with better attention to "the commons".


I remember donating a bit of my Alienware gaming laptop GPU on uni ethernet LAN in like 2010 ROFLMAO


I was at a shop that had beefy workstations for 3D/video/graphics work that I thought I was cool for running @home on the 10 boxes we had. I remember popping up in the top 100 list for a minute.


n to the limit


Regardless, yet another path to the middle class is closing for a lot of people. RIP (probably me too)


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: