So Urban Dictionary clone, but English seems to be the second language in this case.
Is licensing the draw or the differentiator? I don't think the message on that is clear.
This article seems to stretch the meaning of friend quite a bit beyond my comfort zone, but I believe that may just be me.
Mutual interest friends border on what I'd call more acquaintances.
But also, who drops a HTTP link in 2023? You just rawdogged my browser, bro.
The site is also being served over HTTPS for those who haven't yet partaken.
Why the overwhelming benefit of the doubt in an organization that has repeatedly failed expectations?
I don't understand why this is even a conversation.
We don't need them any more. Export restrictions are gone.
What we need is a consortium to capture the attention of the hardware vendors and limit NIST and the NSA to participant status.
Then if the government decides to adopt their backdoored standards, they're the only ones.
I'm not sure N(IST)SA has any credibility left. Polularity of curve 25519 over their P curves is encouraging and it would be great to see the community continue this direction and largely ignore them going forward.
The government shouldn't be leading or deciding, it would be better organized around gathering current consensus and following when it comes to FIPS, regulation, etc.
I have a question about the arbitrary memory test and palindromes. Are we talking about the memory required to test? Or the memory required to hold the string?
The only memory required to test a palindrome should be that for two characters because you only need compare the first and last character and continue toward the middle so long as those match. If you end up with 0 or 1 characters remaining and all previous comparisons have matched then the word is a palindrome. It doesn't seem that different to me than possibly infinitely testing if the next character is still an A in the case of (A*)
The memory required to test. Moreover, we do not have random access to the string, we may only read one byte at a time and cannot go back. You may call it "streaming access".
That depends on how noticed it gets. My company makes embedded systems that in some failure cases can kill - we have a history of losing large lawsuits over the base 70 years (before computers of course). As such we have a powerful safety review system in place because million dollar lawsuits make CEOs care - it isn't perfect but there are a lot of things that we don't do that our customers would love.
