Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | ineil's commentslogin

So if I’m told I have an A type personality and am also often called an A hole does that mean I can concatenate both to create the compound condition of having type holes?


Seems to have an error on the "or" logic explanation on the boolean algebra page under "rules of the game"?


0 or 0 = 0 0 or 0 = 1


Indeed. Also "compliment" should be "complement" if one wanted to be really picky.


It’s a negotiation! Don’t run away, use it to build negotiation muscle even if you don’t progress with it.

If they were just willing to give you 1/3 without negotiating I’d bet they would act the same the negotiating with VCs or customers and the biz would be a disaster!

Use the opportunity to level up and not think like an employee expecting everything to be handed to you on a plate.

I agree with the advice to agree all the parameters of how things will work including who leads and how things get done in all areas. Equity % is just one parameter in a multi variate equation.


Sure always negotiate,

but “If they were just willing to give you 1/3 without negotiating I’d bet they would act the same the negotiating with VCs or customers and the biz would be a disaster!” just isn’t true consistently enough to be useful.

Context is important, but if what OP is saying is correct, them not opening closer to an equal split suggests they have a lack of capabilities assessing their founding team here or it’s their first time around the block.

Maybe you could screw integral founding team members into taking a fraction of the equity they deserve, but you’re setting up shitty team dynamics, dysfunction, and problems to come. For cofounders and employees: I’ve found you’re better off paying the ballpark of what they’re worth and would be excited about vs trying to get them at their bottom dollar


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: