Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | dncornholio's commentslogin

Everyone prefers voting.. But to be able to vote, a vote must be happening. Protests are sometimes the only way to make a vote happen in the first place.

They are also a good communication tool for the world to see what the people are struggling with.


Similar? Very different. The HKmap.live app was build and marketed directly for the protests. It tracked social media and geolocated where the police and protests were happening, etc. This is a big distinction.


Is this true? My understanding was that Twitter was not really moderated, because of Dorsey?


Terrible. You cannot 'ls' if ls is not the right answer. Completely useless.


That's not true. You can absolutely use ls and other commands to poke around before creating the winning command.


They can. They don't want to though.


How does Kagi know what is AI stuff? I don't see how they can 'just turn it off'


By "turn it off" I mostly mean that Kagi have their own AI driven tools available, but a toggle in your user settings disables it completely.

ie it's not forced down your throat, nor mysteriously/accidentally/etc turned back on occasionally


It's driven by community ratings.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45919067


so it is like humans vs robots started? robots ask humans questions to verify they are not robots. humans mark content as robot-generated to filter it out.


My first instinct is that users abuse it like they do any other report/downvote mechanism. They see something they just don't plain like, they report it as AI slop.


It will also let the LLM process even more tokens, thus decreasing it's accuracy


Because it's stateless it's not pointless? Good codebases don't change fast. Stuff gets added but for the most stuff, they shouldn't change.


A well-documented codebase lets both developers and agentic models locate relevant code easily. If you treat the model like a teammate, extra docs for LLMs are unnecessary. IMHO. In frontend work, code moves quickly.


We shouldn't rely on YouTube to write our history. It's just an American entertainment website that makes money of ads. It has no other obligations. It can do whatever it wants, or what the US government wants. This is not news.


Is this even a fair comparison when Ford and Chrysler offer a lot more models than Tesla does?


Fords recall numbers have skyrocketed in recent years. So Fords real comparison to its previous self, 2015 they had 68. Why isn’t Fords roughly doubling of recalls news?


It's reasonably well known that Ford has had a very bad year for recalls; it's definitely made the rounds in the auto world, and breaks through to the mainstream news from time to time.

https://www.motortrend.com/news/2024-2026-ford-ranger-recall...

https://247wallst.com/investing/2025/10/17/ford-recall-recor...

https://www.usatoday.com/story/cars/recalls/2025/09/24/ford-...

https://www.macheforum.com/site/threads/ford-issues-more-saf...


>Why isn’t Fords roughly doubling of recalls news?

Oh, I don't know, maybe because Tesla is bigger than the rest of the entire industry combined?

Besides, safety recalls are what matters. I get lots of small qualtiy-related recalls that are so minor I don't even bother getting them done. Meanwhile, Tesla does what it can to avoid quality recalls, because for a while it was a marketing blurb for them.


By units sold per year Tesla is the 15th biggest car company. Ford is 6th. (This is with Hyundai and Kia counted as the same).

By revenue from those sales rather than units, Tesla is 12th. Ford is 6th.


It’s not. For example, Saab has had 0 recalls.


Saab also currently produces 0 models.


That’s the point.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: