This is kind of backwards .

GitHub's privacy statement [1] says > GitHub personnel does not access private repository information without your consent except as provided...

Do you have any evidence that private repos on GitHub are being used for training?

In the opposite case, if you have a public repo on GitHub then you should expect it to be laundered through LLMs :\

[1] https://docs.github.com/en/site-policy/privacy-policies/gith...

Sounds like authentication is working great, but their authorization design may be flawed.

How is it flawed? That is the nature of crowdsourcing.

Maybe you could create a ballot initiative for the next election, that would disband the lobby? See how the people vote.

I think our corporate VPN doesn't send zoom video traffic through the VPN. As you enabled the VPN, you didn't see any dropped frames.

Split tunnelling means the UDP packets just go through the normal internet.

I'd rather you attribute your facts to an LLM vs. rephrase a hallucination that sounds right.

Zig doesn't make it simpler! Now in a single function, using async won't spawn threads, while using sync might.

But I'm digging this abstraction.

I really liked using parallels, but when I got my apple silicon MacBook it was too much headache trying to get apps to compile on ARM. I meant to look into x86 VMs but it was experimental last I looked.

Do you have evidence the accounts are fake? That all those accounts are fake?

> Do you have evidence the accounts are fake? That all those accounts are fake?

As if you could cryptographically verify any ownership, let alone any source that was being posted on chan boards.

You act as if nobody ever lies on the internet. The solution to your emotional distress is to start to not give a fvck.

It wouldn't be a problem if git didn't try to magic away the difference.

Isn't midair refueling notoriously difficult to get right? The headlines would become "airliner crashes after crew couldn't thread the needle for 45 min"

It's a ridiculous proposition.