That is in no way true

Yup. All of them combined would probably be ~$100-120/mo. which is, lo and behold, the price of a cable package

With inflation, it's much cheaper.

Still, the real issue is one that both cable and streaming services don't solve.

People don't want to pay for what they don't watch. Both streaming and cable have the price of everything they own and produce built into the price. When you subscribe to either, you're subsidizing a bunch of stuff you don't care about.

People don't want to pay $20 a month to watch stranger things in oreer to subsidize a bunch of stuff they don't watch. It was the same with cable. Netflix is just one giant cable bundle, it always has been.

That's because in its current form, that's all it's good for reliably. Can't sell that it might hallucinate the numbers in the Q4 report

I'd pay a separate subscription if I got to watch all these workprints. Fascinating stuff.

Their update where they got $10k reward from R* brought a smile to my face

As I get older I'm realizing a lot of things in this world don't get better. Some do, to be fair, but some don't.

Efficiency, not money, seems to be the currency of chatbots

So it doesn't work is what you're saying, right?

A new "boutique" mutual/ETF would spin up overnight which included just the assets already being insider traded.

The musicians suffer a lot with macOS upgrades, but I've found even if some hardware isn't supported officially, it most oftentimes works somewhat well.