Are you a representative of a camera installation company or do you sell services? Please do not distort the information that is written on the site. And it says there that the project ASKS everyone who uses the firmware for commercial purposes to contact. You are simply confusing MIT with real life realities.

Sorry, you are slightly mistaken and mislead the colleagues present here.

The OpenIPC project is completely open wherever possible, but it allows the use of various streamers Divinus/Majestic/Mini/Venc/other and various binary drivers and libraries if the chip manufacturer does not provide open source code.

The Divinus streamer is a great alternative to Majestic and it is open and also part of the OpenIPC ecosystem - https://github.com/openipc/divinus

That's right, you're right my friend.

Thank you

Please inform the developers of the characteristics of your cameras. Perhaps they simply don't have them.

All kernels, libraries and applications are open source and built from source code. Only the part of the streamer that intersects with the chip manufacturer’s SDK, uses its calls, and is under NDA is closed. Thus, even if theoretically you open that part of the Majestic streamer that is closed, it will not give much, since everything else from the chip manufacturer will be closed and cannot be published openly officially

Yes, now the delay numbers have decreased significantly, and the quality has improved. No need to look at old information ;)

Please check this

https://github.com/openipc/builder?tab=readme-ov-file#list-o...

https://github.com/OpenIPC/wiki/blob/master/en/guide-support...

https://github.com/topics/device-openipc

https://openipc.org/supported-hardware/full-list

What prevents you personally from taking part in supporting open streamers?

https://github.com/openipc/mini https://github.com/OpenIPC/silicon_research/tree/master/venc https://github.com/openipc/smolrtsp

Yes, you are right