Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | Uptrenda's commentslogin

Can't believe one shitty website can take down most of the mainstream web.

Would this work over SSH? I have many shells that I use for testing on different OSes and some of them have no working editors at all. I wonder what versions your binary builds will work on.

Yes, it will, as it uses terminal emulation with ANSI colors. See the author below referencing tmux + ssh as a motivation for TUI.

This seems like the canary in the coal mine. We have a company that built this tool because it seemed semi-possible (prob "works" well enough most of the time) and they don't want to fall behind if anything that's built turns out to be the next chatgpt. So there's no caution for anything now, even ideas that can go catastrophically wrong.

Yeah, its data now, but soon we'll have home robotics platforms that are cheap and capable. They'll run a "model" with "human understanding", only, any weird bugs may end up causing irreparable harm. Like, you tell the robot to give your pet a bath and it puts it in the washing machine because its... you know, not actually thinking beyond a magic trick. The future is really marching fast now.


Delusional vibe coding bullshit. Find me one significant software project based on using natural language for the software.

If you're still using all the same services though how exactly are you winning over addictive behaviour? eeehhhhh???

ive seen this advertised for months now. still have no idea what the hell it is.

The LLM only reflects the input of what its fed. If the results are unintelligent then so is the input.

All my commit messages are a mess and I spend the time that I have designing and writing code, not figuring out how to make the commit message look pretty. That's what merges are for. I don't see the value of this tbh. Just pedantic time wasting.


When these people say "commit" they're referring to the same concept you "merge".


I have branches that I work in and fork out from in every direction before merging everything back into master. My branches are messy because they're works in progress so I don't care about the commit messages. For the final merge back into master its a high-level overview of changes. I don't try detail every change. I honestly think that devs obsess too much over this clean commit history thing and that it looks to me like pedantic OCD.


I mean, git lends itself to a lot of approaches, the ultimate goal is that the master repo's main branch has a readable and logical set of commit messages usefully describing every change.

Personally I try to avoid merge commits these days, although that's more of a habit than any reasoned position, as such I make frequent use of rebase/squash to edit previous commit messages. Is that worrying about clean commits?


Not really, necessarily


Man, if you had that many nodes can you guys imagine how much cool tech you could build with that? Like you could literally rival Tor with one command. Or build a decentralized archive system. Yet, the only thing these nodes will end up doing is being used to prop up some losers ego. Literally what a waste. If you're going to commit crime at least do something cool.


Most of the compromised devices are routers or IoT devices, functionally no compute power to do anything interesting except spam IPs with requests.


You could easily get better performance with a pair of well-optimized high-density cabinets, much more reliable and not even that expensive to operate legitimately.


Damn smart kid. You're going to have a bright future. Stay away from bad influences and you'll be a star.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: