What sorts of limitations you have with Obsidian? for diagrams I use Mermaid and it's work flawlessly within Obsidian.
For anything fancy, advanced and customized, I use Obsidian Canvas, it's a new feature they released recently. So far, I don't need anything outside Obsidian to do any kind of note taking/writing.
80% are just boilerplate text with one text box per page. It's shitty paperwork but it's not 644 pages of tons of input. There person you're replying to probably owns a business or works in multiple states or something goofy like that. They're on the upper end of complicated
I do not own a business. In 2024 I only worked in CA. However, a couple years back I worked in MI for a few days, which means for the following 4 years I have to file MI taxes as well due to RSU vesting. So my 2024 taxes were federal + CA + MI.
Nim, for one. It has an incredibly powerful macro and template system. But other languages with similar macro power include Elixir and Julia.
D has a generic system similar to Nim's, and a mixin system similar to Nim's templates, but doesn't have a powerful AST-manipulating macro system like the above languages.
this is like asking which restaurants have mom's cooking - none but there are plenty that are close enough and don't require you to travel all the way back to wherever your moms lives.
I would absolutely love to read about that. Please, if you have the time to do that, do it.
also do you have a blog or a place where I can follow you and read your articles/code?
you would be surprised, but many people do programming on their phones. I can't imagine the pain to do that though, PC is way more flexible to do programming on.
curious what mark of the beast has to do with a federal ID? I always thought the opposition majority because it's not something in the constitution to be a centralized by the federal government and it was left for the state to handle.
Just google "is real ID the mark of the beast" or "is social security number the mark of the beast" like I did above.
The premillenial dispensationalism theory is widespread in southern evangelical churches in the US, with big sales of associated media.
The association is "verse says a mark will be required and a number of the beast is mentioned" -> "these are numbers assigned by the government required for commerce" -> "this is the mark." The language of the apocalopytic verses is flowery enough that people pick and choose which parts they take literally, so for a while it wasn't seen as necessarily an injection (or you could also believe that eventually you'd have to get a SSN tattoo, say).
the general population are dumb, you are expecting too much from them to be honest.
the forward March toward dystopian tomorrow will never stop, we will lament the stupidity of the public who made this possible in our small corners on the internet.
I think it generally not wise to project the political conflicts and fault lines of one's own country on to other countries which exist in very different contexts.
we started to see this kind of disturbing dystopian legislations in Australia, European countries, uk and next is the United States. I don't think it's limited to one country.
I voted no in this, but I was on the fence. In my experience people are smarter than they get credit for and the decisions made in these votes are often quite good. There was more to consider than privacy, it's also about the fact that most countries will implement something like this as it is pushed by the UN. So it might become required for some things in the future. Then we currently don't have a whole lot of ways to distinguish AI from people anymore, which will only get worse. Propaganda bots are real and we don't know how that will evolve. It will make a lot of the processes easier as you can do them from home, which is especially useful for disabled people that can not easily appear physically. Plus, it's more or less optional to have one for now.
And yet, I am still kinda disappointed it passed. We will see how it evolves.
