You can chain multiple Mac Studios using exo for inference, you'd "only" need two of these. There's a bottleneck in the RMA speed over TB5, but this may not matter as much for a MoE model.
It's tax avoidance, not evasion. If it's fully legal then I don't know why wouldn't you recommend it. If you are against it, you can easily pay more in taxes than required yourself.
This marketing is dumb, and if Apple believes that not even they themselves can get access to the information running on the platform, then they could put their money where their mouth is. Increase the max bounty reward from $50 000 to $50 000 000 000 with no other rules than if you can get access to users' request data without having the phone it's sent from, then you get the money, and Apple will not legally pursue the attacker.
Is it as secure as they say? Then it doesn't matter if all the money Apple has is the reward, because nobody can get it. A max bounty of $50 000 for "Accidental or unexpected data disclosure due to deployment or configuration issue" is silly low.
To be fair, Google as done a lot for the web. Google is also the one who has been pushing for the web as an alternative to native apps, while Apple has been the one to actively sabotage. If only everyone used Firefox and Mozilla was the one with the most influence...
Right. Without pressure from Chrome we'd be locked into proprietary, incompatible native app stores with no recourse over arbitrary, anti-competitive review processes. The flourishing of web apps like Figma and Notion would never have happened.
The web has many shortcomings as an app platform but at least you can still build what you want without getting permission from a trillion dollar tech giant.
