Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | MavropaliasG's commentslogin

Which "Island", is that a book?


PeerTube is built to scale, the more users the better bandwidth because you stream from peers


That's nice in theory. In practise though im doubtful. Churn is going to be much higher on something like peer tube than something like traditional bit torrent. Access patterns might also potentially be distributed badly for some videos.

Not to mention the long tail of less popular vidros.


Why don't you go and watch some videos on PeerTube and see the practice for yourself?


Because peertube is not operating at scale so the issues i mentioned wouldn't be present.


If the issues you are worried about aren't present yet, then logically right now it would be a comparable to and a competitor with YouTube. People in the main don't avoid web services because of hypothetical technical problems that might exist in the future but that the design seems superficially resistant to.

PeerTube actually does have technical issues in there here and now, but the number one problem is just that YouTube is an excellent service preferred by both users and advertisers and PeerTube doesn't seem able to outdo it in any meaningful way.


> If the issues you are worried about aren't present yet, then logically right now it would be a comparable to and a competitor with YouTube

By that logic, AWS free tier is a competitor to youtube.


More money is not the problem, Firefox receives 600+ million USD per year. Is how they waste the money and going back on their pledges and what Mozilla stood for


Been using it since 2015 as my main driver in all my computers, and rarely did I have an issue with stability.


What about the ultimatum we were given 2 years ago on COVID vaccines from our employers?


If you felt that strongly against vaccines, sure. The same rule applies. You have a bad culture fit and need to find a place better fitting for you.


At the end of the article the author seems resigned and that it seems impossible to bring this to the end user. I don't understand why? Why can't this be a keyboard that I can switch to, like I'm able to switch from Samsung keyboard to Google keyboard? Or like an accessibility app?


Because the text editing process is baked in the base UI classes on Android (TextView), you cannot change it with an app. OEM manufacturers sometimes do because they ship different class code with their OS.


But the author works at Google, so can surely pass the message on up the chain that this design decision is stifling innovation in touch-based text editing?


I'm the author. I've been trying...


I suggest focusing on the minimum viable product: an app with a single text field.

Maybe add the option to load and save txt files, but even clipboard I/O would be sufficient. Just let people play with the editor. If it's actually good, the next steps should become obvious.


It’s a big company, so unless you can make a nice project to be promoted, it doesn’t get in the list of priorities


Can someone explain to me what is the advantage of using something like LastPass over simply the in-built password manager that Firefox or other browsers have? I know that LastPass can be used for desktop applications too, but if you are only using a password for the web, is LastPass offering anything more than the in-built browser password manager?


Safari's built-in pw manager:

- until recently, didn't have 2fa

- doesn't support multiple domains under the same account (e.g., the stackexchange network is considered one site per subdomain)

- doesn't support generating complex passwords (it'll generate passwords but I'd hardly call them complex…)

- doesn't support credentials not associated with websites (e.g., an SSH login, a bank pin…)


Also doesn’t support recovery questions. As someone who generally enjoys safari, the password manager could use some love. Integration across devices is good though.


It does support the per-subdomain option now. You can edit a password to say whether it applies to the whole domain or a specific host.


Who only logs in on websites? So many apps also require logging in.

I'm also not sure if those built-in password managers sync to other devices and if you want to trust them with it.


Downside of Firefox Sync for password management is indeed its lack of iOS app integration. Sadly, I suspect it is Apple making it impossible to compete.

Upside is that it also syncs to my Firefox on Linux, which Apple’s doesn’t.


Syncing to my phone apps is my big reason.


credentials/certificates/keys/data storage, secure sharing etc. Pretty much anything that's more complex than single user username + password doesn't seem to be served by the current built-in managers.


A lot of these require deeper system integration, and this is not, in my experience, cross-platform. I’d rather have to drag my SSH/VPN keys and certs around manually, and have basic password management working across iOS, MacOS and Linux.


Most well-documented pharmacological intervention to increase lifespan in aspirin. The most well-documented non-pharmacological is caloric restriction (with some evidence showing protein restriction).


So they didn't use an object-oriented programming language, they used a functional programming language.


Easier to parallelize and without all the side effects, which only occur when trying to directly observe them.


No they used the equivalent of a crazy, maybe infinitely, dense “bit” and all “programming” is things invented by the human brain to model this unknowable “objective” architecture. The universe isn’t actually a computer and even if it is it’s a computer so beyond us that computer science isn’t adequate to describe it.


Functional lisp I think God used


Nominally. In reality most of it is just a bunch of perl scripts stiched together.


Yes, and that's precisely my hypothesis :)


Should have stated in the post that it's your hypothesis


Well...sort of. The last part is my hypothesis. The first part isn't. Particles don't have a trajectory (location and momentum) within spacetime in the normal way we think of them as having. This has been known for a very long time :)


Use OSF (osf.io) instead, which is made for open science


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: