If you consider choosing to leave a job of a tool a choice that people can easily make, then sure. Otherwise, yeah a good portion of employees don't have any say in the software their managers choose, and either use it or get let go
How will the people selling the content be able to advertise the content? Asking as when I went to the site all I see are blurred images with prices below them (I don't feel inclined to shell out cash to see what it looks like unblurred).
Creators can add preview files (unblurred samples, descriptions, etc.) so buyers aren't going in completely blind. The blurred images you're seeing are the distorted versions of the actual content, which is the default when no preview is added.
Every Piece has its own shareable link with a rich preview (title, description, thumbnail) that renders nicely when shared on social media or in a chat. So the main distribution channel right now is creators sharing their links wherever their audience is. There's also an API for AI agents, so agents can discover, evaluate, and buy content programmatically.
The platform also has an explore page for discovery, and creators build up a public rating and volume score over time which helps signal quality.
Yes, exactly. There are some tools that are used over and over again. But apart from that, dirt ramps are the norm in scientific computing. Once it gets you over the 2 meter wall of publication, it's disposable.
reply